Legal Experts Slam Biden's 11th-Hour Constitutional Shift As Cynical And Irrelevant

Introduction

In a stunning move, President Joe Biden has proposed a last-minute constitutional amendment to address the Supreme Court's recent rulings on abortion and gun rights. The proposal has sparked a firestorm of criticism from legal experts, who denounce it as a "cynical and irrelevant" attempt to appease political allies.

Expert Opinions

Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the University of California, Berkeley School of Law, argues that the amendment is "unnecessary and unwise." He points out that the Supreme Court has already ruled on the issues of abortion and gun rights, and that constitutional amendments should only be used for truly fundamental changes.

Laurence Tribe, a Harvard Law School professor and constitutional law expert, agrees. He calls the amendment a "political stunt" that is "not a serious attempt to address the underlying problems." He argues that the real solution lies in passing legislation and appointing judges who will uphold the Constitution and protect individual rights.

Timing and Cynicism

Many critics have also raised concerns about the timing of the amendment proposal. They argue that it is a cynical attempt by Biden to shore up support among his base just months before the midterm elections.

Carrie Severino, president of the Judicial Crisis Network, a conservative legal advocacy group, says the amendment is "nothing more than a desperate attempt to appease the Democratic base." She argues that it is a "power grab" by the Biden administration that would undermine the independence of the judiciary.

Relevance and Impact

Beyond the timing and cynicism, critics also question the relevance and impact of the proposed amendment. They argue that it would not actually change the law on abortion or gun rights, since the Supreme Court has already ruled on those issues.

John Yoo, a former Bush administration official and law professor at the University of California, Berkeley, argues that the amendment is "completely unnecessary." He says that the Supreme Court's rulings on abortion and gun rights are "settled law," and that the amendment would not alter them.

Conclusion

The Biden administration's proposed constitutional amendment has been met with widespread criticism from legal experts, who denounce it as a "cynical and irrelevant" attempt to appease political allies. Critics argue that the amendment is unnecessary, unwise, ill-timed, and would not actually change the law on abortion or gun rights.

The broader implications of the amendment proposal are significant. It raises concerns about the politicization of the judiciary, the role of the Supreme Court in our constitutional system, and the ability of the Biden administration to address fundamental issues facing the nation.

Read also: A Former Pa. Judge Involved In The 'Kids For Cash' Scandal Is Granted Clemency By President Joe Biden